[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTbrq7QZMYG0M3ka@black.igk.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 16:15:55 +0100
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: Use resource_set_range() that correctly sets
->end
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 04:56:54PM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> __pci_read_base() sets resource start and end addresses when resource
> is larger than 4G but pci_bus_addr_t or resource_size_t are not capable
> of representing 64-bit PCI addresses. This creates a problematic
> resource that has non-zero flags but the start and end addresses do not
> yield to resource size of 0 but 1.
>
> Replace custom resource addresses setup with resource_set_range()
> that correctly sets end address as -1 which results in resource_size()
> returning 0.
>
> For consistency, also use resource_set_range() in the other branch that
> does size based resource setup.
Since I have been involved in the related discussion and the patch LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists