[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251209190254.GA927812-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:02:54 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"biju.das.au" <biju.das.au@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"magnus.damm" <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
wsa+renesas <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] dt-bindings: serial: renesas,rsci: Document
RZ/G3E support
On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 08:23:06AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > Sent: 04 December 2025 08:03
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/17] dt-bindings: serial: renesas,rsci: Document RZ/G3E support
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 04:42:57PM +0000, Biju wrote:
> > > From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > >
> > > Add documentation for the serial communication interface (RSCI) found
> > > on the Renesas RZ/G3E (R9A09G047) SoC. The RSCI IP on this SoC is
> > > identical to that on the RZ/T2H (R9A09G077) SoC, but it has a 32-stage
> > > FIFO compared to 16 on RZ/T2H. It supports both FIFO and non-FIFO mode
> > > operation. RZ/G3E has 6 clocks(5 module clocks + 1 external clock)
> > > compared to 3 clocks
> > > (2 module clocks + 1 external clock) on RZ/T2H, and it has multiple resets.
> > > It has 6 interrupts compared to 4 on RZ/T2H.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > > ---
> > > v4->v5:
> > > * Updated commit description related to IRQ difference
> > > * Added aed and bfd irqs for RZ/G3E.
> > > * Moved reset: false to RZ/T2H SoC and dropped the else part for RZ/G3E.
> > > * Updated conditional schema with interrupts and interrupts-names.
> > > * Dropped the tag as there are new changes.
> > > v3->v4:
> > > * Dropped separate compatible for non-FIFO mode and instead using single
> > > compatible "renesas,r9a09g047-rsci" as non-FIFO mode can be achieved
> > > by software configuration.
> > > * Renamed clock-names bus->pclk
> > > * Rearranged clock-names tclk{4, 16, 64}
> > > * Retained the tag as the changes are trivial.
> > > v2->v3:
> > > * Dropped 1st and 3rd items from clk-names and added minItems for the
> > > range.
> > > * Added minItems for clk and clk-names for RZ/T2H as the range is 2-3
> > > * Added maxItems for clk and clk-names for RZ/G3E as the range is 5-6
> > > * Retained the tag as it is trivial change.
> > > v1->v2:
> > > * Updated commit message
> > > * Added resets:false for non RZ/G3E SoCs.
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/serial/renesas,rsci.yaml | 99 ++++++++++++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,rsci.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,rsci.yaml
> > > index 6b1f827a335b..1f8cee8171de 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,rsci.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,rsci.yaml
> > > @@ -10,46 +10,72 @@ maintainers:
> > > - Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > > - Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> > >
> > > -allOf:
> > > - - $ref: serial.yaml#
> > > -
> > > properties:
> > > compatible:
> > > oneOf:
> > > - - items:
> > > - - const: renesas,r9a09g087-rsci # RZ/N2H
> > > - - const: renesas,r9a09g077-rsci # RZ/T2H
> > > + - enum:
> > > + - renesas,r9a09g047-rsci # RZ/G3E
> > > + - renesas,r9a09g077-rsci # RZ/T2H
> > >
> > > - items:
> > > + - const: renesas,r9a09g087-rsci # RZ/N2H
> > > - const: renesas,r9a09g077-rsci # RZ/T2H
> > >
> > > reg:
> > > maxItems: 1
> > >
> > > interrupts:
> > > + minItems: 4
> > > items:
> > > - description: Error interrupt
> > > - description: Receive buffer full interrupt
> > > - description: Transmit buffer empty interrupt
> > > - description: Transmit end interrupt
> > > + - description: Active edge detection interrupt
> > > + - description: Break field detection interrupt
> > >
> > > interrupt-names:
> > > + minItems: 4
> > > items:
> > > - const: eri
> > > - const: rxi
> > > - const: txi
> > > - const: tei
> > > + - const: aed
> > > + - const: bfd
> > >
> > > clocks:
> > > minItems: 2
> > > - maxItems: 3
> > > + maxItems: 6
> > >
> > > clock-names:
> > > - minItems: 2
> > > + oneOf:
> > > + - items:
> > > + - const: operation
> > > + - const: bus
> > > + - const: sck # optional external clock input
> > > +
> > > + minItems: 2
> > > +
> > > + - items:
> > > + - const: pclk
Isn't this still just 'bus'?
> > > + - const: tclk
And 'operation'?
Sure, renaming would look nicer, but better to extend than just change
the binding.
> > > + - const: tclk_div4
> > > + - const: tclk_div16
> > > + - const: tclk_div64
> > > + - const: sck # optional external clock input
> > > +
> > > + minItems: 5
> > > +
> > > + resets:
> > > items:
> > > - - const: operation
> > > - - const: bus
> > > - - const: sck # optional external clock input
> > > + - description: Input for resetting the APB clock
> > > + - description: Input for resetting TCLK
> > > +
> > > + reset-names:
> > > + items:
> > > + - const: presetn
> > > + - const: tresetn
> >
> > You did not include lore links, so I cannot check whether we already talked about this (why you still
> > do not send big patchsets like this with b4?), but you are mixing here devices with completely
> > different innputs. This does not make the binding readable.
>
> See the links.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251031000012.GA466250-robh@kernel.org/
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20251030-regroup-garter-c70c7fc6a71a@spud/
>
> I use the below command to send the patches, is it wrong? I will try b4 next time.
>
> git send-email --annotate *.patch
>
> >
> > Split the binding.
>
> I can split the binding, if Rob/Conor/Geert is OK with it.
>
> Ie, Always put per SoC changes in new dt bindings files to make it more readable without any complex if
> statements.
There's no hard rule. It's a judgement call. If the if/then schemas are
longer than the main schema, then it is probably time for a split. The
downside to splitting is then there's no motivation to keep resource
names the same (and makes it harder to review that).
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists