[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251209094810.fb53ac6296656d361754d593@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 09:48:10 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pengdonglin <pengdonglin@...omi.com>, Masami
Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fgraph: Use BTF to trim and filter return values
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 21:19:16 +0800
Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com> wrote:
> From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
>
> The current funcgraph-retval implementation has two limitations:
>
> 1. It prints a return value even when the traced function returns void.
> 2. When the return type is narrower than a register, the printed value may
> be incorrect because high bits can contain undefined data.
>
> Both issues are addressed by using BTF to obtain the precise return type
> of each traced function:
>
> - Return values are now printed only for functions whose return type is
> not void.
> - The value is truncated to the actual width of the return type, ensuring
> correct representation.
>
> These changes make the funcgraph-retval output more accurate and remove
> noise from void functions.
>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@...omi.com>
> Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> index 17c75cf2348e..9e63665c81e2 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>
> #include "trace.h"
> #include "trace_output.h"
> +#include "trace_btf.h"
>
> /* When set, irq functions might be ignored */
> static int ftrace_graph_skip_irqs;
> @@ -865,6 +866,46 @@ static void print_graph_retaddr(struct trace_seq *s, struct fgraph_retaddr_ent_e
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETVAL) || defined(CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RETADDR)
>
> +static void trim_retval(unsigned long func, unsigned long *retval, bool *print_retval)
> +{
> + const struct btf_type *t;
> + char name[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
> + struct btf *btf;
> + u32 v, msb;
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF))
> + return;
> +
> + if (lookup_symbol_name(func, name))
> + return;
> +
> + t = btf_find_func_proto(name, &btf);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(t))
> + return;
> +
> + t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, t->type, NULL);
> + switch (t ? BTF_INFO_KIND(t->info) : BTF_KIND_UNKN) {
> + case BTF_KIND_UNKN:
> + *print_retval = false;
> + break;
> + case BTF_KIND_ENUM:
> + case BTF_KIND_ENUM64:
> + msb = BITS_PER_BYTE * t->size - 1;
> + *retval &= GENMASK(msb, 0);
> + break;
> + case BTF_KIND_INT:
> + v = *(u32 *)(t + 1);
> + if (BTF_INT_ENCODING(v) == BTF_INT_BOOL)
> + msb = 0;
> + else
> + msb = BTF_INT_BITS(v) - 1;
> + *retval &= GENMASK(msb, 0);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +}
Hmm, I think we should have another flag which directly tells the print
format of retval from BTF.
> +
> static void print_graph_retval(struct trace_seq *s, struct ftrace_graph_ent_entry *entry,
> struct ftrace_graph_ret *graph_ret, void *func,
> u32 opt_flags, u32 trace_flags, int args_size)
> @@ -884,17 +925,20 @@ static void print_graph_retval(struct trace_seq *s, struct ftrace_graph_ent_entr
> print_retaddr = !!(opt_flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_RETADDR);
> #endif
>
> - if (print_retval && retval && !hex_format) {
> - /* Check if the return value matches the negative format */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && (retval & BIT(31)) &&
> - (((u64)retval) >> 32) == 0) {
> - err_code = sign_extend64(retval, 31);
> - } else {
> - err_code = retval;
The original code just guesses the type (signed/unsigned) from
the retval, but we don't need to do that with BTF.
Thank you,
> + if (print_retval) {
> + trim_retval((unsigned long)func, &retval, &print_retval);
> + if (print_retval && retval && !hex_format) {
> + /* Check if the return value matches the negative format */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && (retval & BIT(31)) &&
> + (((u64)retval) >> 32) == 0) {
> + err_code = sign_extend64(retval, 31);
> + } else {
> + err_code = retval;
> + }
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(err_code))
> + err_code = 0;
> }
> -
> - if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(err_code))
> - err_code = 0;
> }
>
> if (entry) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists