lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176527571937.622968.1155008972776537715.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 19:21:59 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, 
 Prajna Rajendra Kumar <prajna.rajendrakumar@...rochip.com>, 
 Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: microchip-core: Fix an error handling path in
 mchp_corespi_probe()

On Fri, 05 Dec 2025 22:14:10 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> mchp_corespi_init() calls mchp_corespi_enable_ints(), so
> mchp_corespi_disable_ints() should be called if an error occurs after
> calling mchp_corespi_init(), as already done in the remove function.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: microchip-core: Fix an error handling path in mchp_corespi_probe()
      commit: 8cef9b451dc6fdf86b92c7a35d55a47465d500db

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ