[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb77069524eec1df222b2ecbc6ddf5c3b4b041bb.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 19:28:33 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, Huacai Chen
<chenhuacai@...nel.org>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, Alice Ryhl
<aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg
<arve@...roid.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Christian Brauner
<christian@...uner.io>, Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc: Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Danilo
Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Trevor
Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, rust-for-linux
<rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mainline loongarch64 defconfig+Rust build error
On Tue, 2025-12-09 at 11:56 +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am seeing in mainline loongarch64 defconfig+Rust the following build
> error [1].
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
> [1]
>
> error[E0425]: cannot find value `compat_ptr_ioctl` in crate `bindings`
> --> drivers/android/binder/rust_binder_main.rs:317:38
> |
> 317 | compat_ioctl: Some(bindings::compat_ptr_ioctl),
> | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a
> function with a similar name exists: `compat_sys_ioctl`
> |
> ::: /__w/quick/quick/linux/rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs:78264:5
> |
> 78264 | pub fn compat_sys_ioctl(fd: ffi::c_uint, cmd: ffi::c_uint,
> arg: compat_ulong_t) -> ffi::c_long;
> | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> similarly named function `compat_sys_ioctl` defined here
I highly doubt if this is really a LoongArch-only issue. We have:
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
extern long compat_ptr_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
unsigned long arg);
#else
#define compat_ptr_ioctl NULL
#endif
AFAIK bindgen does not translate C preprocessor macro definitions, so
when !CONFIG_COMPAT we won't have the Rust binding for it.
And as LA32 is not upstreamed it's pointless to support COMPAT for
LoongArch, yet.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists