linux-kernel - [PATCH -next 3/5] mm/mglru: extend shrink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251209012557.1949239-4-chenridong@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue,  9 Dec 2025 01:25:55 +0000
From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...weicloud.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
	yuanchu@...gle.com,
	weixugc@...gle.com,
	david@...nel.org,
	lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
	vbabka@...e.cz,
	rppt@...nel.org,
	surenb@...gle.com,
	mhocko@...e.com,
	corbet@....net,
	hannes@...xchg.org,
	roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
	shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
	muchun.song@...ux.dev,
	zhengqi.arch@...edance.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	lujialin4@...wei.com,
	chenridong@...weicloud.com,
	zhongjinji@...or.com
Subject: [PATCH -next 3/5] mm/mglru: extend shrink_one for both lrugen and non-lrugen

From: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>

Currently, flush_reclaim_state is placed differently between
shrink_node_memcgs and shrink_many. shrink_many (only used for gen-LRU)
calls it after each lruvec is shrunk, while shrink_node_memcgs calls it
only after all lruvecs have been shrunk.

This patch moves flush_reclaim_state into shrink_node_memcgs and calls it
after each lruvec. This unifies the behavior and is reasonable because:

1. flush_reclaim_state adds current->reclaim_state->reclaimed to
   sc->nr_reclaimed.
2. For non-MGLRU root reclaim, this can help stop the iteration earlier
   when nr_to_reclaim is reached.
3. For non-root reclaim, the effect is negligible since flush_reclaim_state
   does nothing in that case.

After moving flush_reclaim_state into shrink_node_memcgs, shrink_one can be
extended to support both lrugen and non-lrugen paths. It will call
try_to_shrink_lruvec for lrugen root reclaim and shrink_lruvec otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 584f41eb4c14..795f5ebd9341 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -4758,23 +4758,7 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
 	return nr_to_scan < 0;
 }
 
-static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
-{
-	unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-	unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
-	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
-	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
-
-	try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
-
-	shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
-
-	if (!sc->proactive)
-		vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
-			   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
-
-	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
-}
+static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc);
 
 static void shrink_many(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
@@ -5760,6 +5744,27 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
 	return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction;
 }
 
+static void shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+	unsigned long scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
+	unsigned long reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
+	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
+
+	if (lru_gen_enabled() && root_reclaim(sc))
+		try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+	else
+		shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
+
+	shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority);
+
+	if (!sc->proactive)
+		vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
+			   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
+
+	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
+}
+
 static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 {
 	struct mem_cgroup *target_memcg = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
@@ -5784,8 +5789,6 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(target_memcg, NULL, partial);
 	do {
 		struct lruvec *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
-		unsigned long reclaimed;
-		unsigned long scanned;
 
 		/*
 		 * This loop can become CPU-bound when target memcgs
@@ -5817,19 +5820,7 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 			memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW);
 		}
 
-		reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
-		scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
-
-		shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc);
-
-		shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg,
-			    sc->priority);
-
-		/* Record the group's reclaim efficiency */
-		if (!sc->proactive)
-			vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, memcg, false,
-				   sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
-				   sc->nr_reclaimed - reclaimed);
+		shrink_one(lruvec, sc);
 
 		/* If partial walks are allowed, bail once goal is reached */
 		if (partial && sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim) {
@@ -5863,8 +5854,6 @@ static void shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
 
 	shrink_node_memcgs(pgdat, sc);
 
-	flush_reclaim_state(sc);
-
 	nr_node_reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed;
 
 	/* Record the subtree's reclaim efficiency */
-- 
2.34.1