[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251209134343.GA238880@francesco-nb>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 14:43:43 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@...com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
Jerome Neanne <jneanne@...libre.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: tps65219/am62p kernel oops
Hello Shree,
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 10:32:12AM -0500, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote:
> On 4/30/25 5:21 AM, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:01:14AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 06:52:40PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > > > Am Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:21:19 +0200
> > > > schrieb Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > while working on adding support in mainline for a new board based on TI
> > > > > AM62P SoC I noticed the following Kernel Oops.
> > > > >
> > > > > This oops was reproduced running current Linux
> > > > > master, 6.15.0-rc4+, ca91b9500108d4cf083a635c2e11c884d5dd20ea, but I was able
> > > > > to reproduce the same with 6.14.4.
> > > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > > [ +0.000022] Call trace:
> > > > > [ +0.000011] regulator_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0xa4 (P)
> > > > > [ +0.000018] tps65219_regulator_irq_handler+0x34/0x80
> > > > wild guessing: maybe because irqdata->rdev is not initalized in
> > > > _probe()? At least I do not see where it would be initialized.
> > > your wild guess seems correct, I'll send a proper patch with your
> > > suggested-by after doing a couple of more tests, thanks.
> > so, the bug is clear, however the fix is not an obvious one liner as I was
> > wishing.
> >
> > we would need to add a link from each of the interrupts to the specific
> > regulator. as of now such a connection is not existing in the code.
> I'll try out implementing and testing the solution, but will get to it early next week. Will email with any updates!
What's the status on this? Were you able to do any progress or work on
it?
Thanks
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists