[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47721451.fMDQidcC6G@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 14:58:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Armin Wolf <w_armin@....de>
Subject:
[PATCH v1 09/10] ACPI: battery: Reduce code duplication related to cleanup
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Notice that sysfs_battery_cleanup() calls sysfs_remove_battery() under
battery->update_lock which is also done in acpi_battery_remove(), so
adjust the latter to use it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/battery.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -1279,9 +1279,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_remove(struct a
device_init_wakeup(&device->dev, 0);
unregister_pm_notifier(&battery->pm_nb);
- guard(mutex)(&battery->update_lock);
-
- sysfs_remove_battery(battery);
+ sysfs_battery_cleanup(battery);
}
/* this is needed to learn about changes made in suspended state */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists