[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fece6e6hun7a5kikkronyzphrdbrl7owimeomrhddt4zluqkld@cixvhiht6xy7>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 17:14:46 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] clk: qcom: rpmh: Update the clock suffix for
Glymur
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 02:19:24PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> The current RPMh VRM clock definitions do not accurately represent the
> hardware mapping of these clocks. While there is no functional impact,
> this update aligns the definitions with the hardware convention by adding
> the appropriate suffix to indicate the clock divider and the E0 variant
> for the C3A_E0, C4A_E0, C5A_E0, and C8A_E0 resources on Glymur.
>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists