[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aThETSRch_okmCbe@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2025 17:46:21 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: david.laight.linux@...il.com
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Crt Mori <cmo@...exis.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>,
Luo Jie <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] bitmap: Use FIELD_PREP() in expansion of
FIELD_PREP_WM16()
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:03:07AM +0000, david.laight.linux@...il.com wrote:
> Instead of directly expanding __BF_FIELD_CHECK() (which really ought
> not be used outside bitfield) and open-coding the generation of the
> masked value, just call FIELD_PREP() and add an extra check for
> the mask being at most 16 bits.
...
> +#define FIELD_PREP_WM16(mask, val) \
> +({ \
> + __auto_type _mask = mask; \
> + u32 _val = FIELD_PREP(_mask, val); \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(_mask > 0xffffu, \
> + "FIELD_PREP_WM16: mask too large"); \
Can it be static_assert() instead?
> + _val | (_mask << 16); \
> +})
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists