[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176530164449.86086.1886657108099467825.b4-ty@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2025 10:34:04 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
Cc: Casey Chen <cachen@...estorage.com>,
Yuanyuan Zhong <yzhong@...estorage.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset()
instead of set->tag_list_lock
On Fri, 05 Dec 2025 13:17:01 -0800, Mohamed Khalfella wrote:
> Changes from v3:
> - Fixed typos in commit message.
> - Updated stacktrace in commit message with one taken from recent kernel.
> - Added Fixes: tag to commit message.
> - Deleted synchronize_rcu() (added in v3) and pre-existing
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) call in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set().
> - Updated the commit message to mention why it is safe to delete
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->tag_set_list) in blk_mq_del_queue_tag_set().
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] block: Use RCU in blk_mq_[un]quiesce_tagset() instead of set->tag_list_lock
commit: 59e25ef2b413c72da6686d431e7759302cfccafa
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists