[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTkTz-5QoB8BuLs7@lsvm11u0000554.swis.ap-northeast-2.aws.nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 15:31:43 +0900
From: Yanan Yang <yanan.yang@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, qijian.guo@....com,
justin.jiang@....com, yanan.yang@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add FRDM-IMX91S board
On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 09:21:55AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/12/2025 09:03, Yanan.Yang wrote:
> > Add DT compatible string for NXP FRDM-IMX91S board
> >
> > The FRDM i.MX 91S development board is an low-cost and compact
> > development board featuring the i.MX 91 applications processor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yanan.Yang <yanan.yang@....com>
>
> Are you sure your Latin name contains '.' character? Or you just copied
> login?
>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > index 68a2d5fecc43..82f28be401b8 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > @@ -1412,6 +1412,7 @@ properties:
> > items:
> > - enum:
> > - fsl,imx91-11x11-evk # i.MX91 11x11 EVK Board
> > + - fsl,imx91-11x11-frdm-s # FRDM-IMX91S Board
>
> Anyway, this was sent, or something almost the same.
>
> Align internally before posting duplicates or at least explain why this
> is not a duplicate It is not the job of the community to coordinate how
> NXP employees should work. Srsly, it's NXP's job.
>
Hi Krzysztof,
Thank you for your review and for pointing this out.
This patch set is not a duplicate of the FRDM-IMX91 series. It introduces
support for a new board: FRDM-IMX91S. While FRDM-IMX91S is similar to
FRDM-IMX91, there are hardware differences that require a separate DTS:
- 512MB LPDDR4 (FRDM-IMX91 uses 1GB)
- 256MB FlexSPI-NAND (FRDM-IMX91 uses 8GB eMMC)
- Single GbE port (FRDM-IMX91 has dual GbE)
- PMIC PF9453 (FRDM-IMX91 uses PCA9451A)
These differences were described in the cover letter and commit message,
but I can make them more explicit if needed.
Regards,
Yanan
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists