[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251210085334.GH3707837@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 09:53:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
david.laight.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/30] objtool: Disassemble code with libopcodes
instead of running objdump
On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 10:25:03PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Wouldn't it make sense to improve objdump instead so as to provide the
> features required?
I don't think objdump wants to know about our very Linux kernel specific
sections - which are somewhat subject to change as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists