[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTlLZUDphWwZGaGS@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:28:53 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Dharanitharan R <dharanitharan725@...il.com>
Cc: syzbot+5dd615f890ddada54057@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: atm: lec: add pre_send validation to avoid
uninitialized
+ Edward
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 03:53:55AM +0000, Dharanitharan R wrote:
> syzbot reported a KMSAN uninitialized-value crash caused by reading
> fields from struct atmlec_msg before validating that the skb contains
> enough linear data. A malformed short skb can cause lec_arp_update()
> and other handlers to access uninitialized memory.
>
> Add a pre_send() validator that ensures the message header and optional
> TLVs are fully present. This prevents all lec message types from reading
> beyond initialized skb data.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Reported-by: syzbot+5dd615f890ddada54057@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+5dd615f890ddada54057@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=5dd615f890ddada54057
> Signed-off-by: Dharanitharan R <dharanitharan725@...il.com>
As pointed out elsewhere, this patch largely duplicates the following by
Edward (CCed).
- [PATCH] net: atm: targetless need more input msg
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/tencent_B31D1B432549BA28BB5633CB9E2C1B124B08%40qq.com/
Ideally there would be some collaboration between you and him on this.
Also, as a fix for Networking code, please explicitly target the patch
at net-next.
Subject: [PATCH net] ...
> ---
> net/atm/lec.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/atm/lec.c b/net/atm/lec.c
> index afb8d3eb2185..c893781a490a 100644
> --- a/net/atm/lec.c
> +++ b/net/atm/lec.c
> @@ -489,8 +489,33 @@ static void lec_atm_close(struct atm_vcc *vcc)
> module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> }
>
> +static int lec_atm_pre_send(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct atmlec_msg *mesg;
> + u32 sizeoftlvs;
> + unsigned int msg_size = sizeof(struct atmlec_msg);
Please use reverse xmas tree order - longest line to shortest -
for Networking code.
> +
> + /* Must contain the base message */
> + if (skb->len < msg_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Must have at least msg_size bytes in linear data */
> + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, msg_size))
> + return -EINVAL;
As you pointed out off-list, this check seems to be the main difference
between your patch and Edward's. I agree it seems relevant. But if so I
believe it duplicates the skb->len check above which can be dropped.
Also The indentation of the three above is not correct.
It should only use tabs. checkpatch.pl points this out.
> +
> + mesg = (struct atmlec_msg *)skb->data;
> + sizeoftlvs = mesg->sizeoftlvs;
> +
> + /* Validate TLVs if present */
> + if (sizeoftlvs && !pskb_may_pull(skb, msg_size + sizeoftlvs))
> + return -EINVAL;
Tabs only for indentation on the like above too.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct atmdev_ops lecdev_ops = {
> .close = lec_atm_close,
> + .pre_send = lec_atm_pre_send,
> .send = lec_atm_send
> };
--
pw-bot: changes requested
Powered by blists - more mailing lists