lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251210132227.1988380-1-zhangpengjie2@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 21:22:27 +0800
From: Pengjie Zhang <zhangpengjie2@...wei.com>
To: <rafael@...nel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
	<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<zhanjie9@...ilicon.com>, <zhenglifeng1@...wei.com>, <lihuisong@...wei.com>,
	<yubowen8@...wei.com>, <linhongye@...artners.com>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
	<jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>, <zhangpengjie2@...wei.com>,
	<wangzhi12@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: CPPC: Fix missing PCC check for guaranteed

the current implementation overlooks the 'guaranteed_perf'
register in this check.

If the Guaranteed Performance register is located in the PCC
subspace, the function currently attempts to read it without
acquiring the lock and without sending the CMD_READ doorbell
to the firmware. This can result in reading stale data.

Fixes: 29523f095397 ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for guaranteed performance")
Signed-off-by: Pengjie Zhang <zhangpengjie2@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 3bdeeee3414e..e66e20d1f31b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -1366,7 +1366,8 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps)
 	/* Are any of the regs PCC ?*/
 	if (CPC_IN_PCC(highest_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(lowest_reg) ||
 		CPC_IN_PCC(lowest_non_linear_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nominal_reg) ||
-		CPC_IN_PCC(low_freq_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nom_freq_reg)) {
+		CPC_IN_PCC(low_freq_reg) || CPC_IN_PCC(nom_freq_reg) ||
+		CPC_IN_PCC(guaranteed_reg)) {
 		if (pcc_ss_id < 0) {
 			pr_debug("Invalid pcc_ss_id\n");
 			return -ENODEV;
-- 
2.33.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ