lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251210180058.2115010-1-visitorckw@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:00:58 +0000
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: djakov@...nel.org
Cc: jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw,
	marscheng@...gle.com,
	wllee@...gle.com,
	aarontian@...gle.com,
	hsuanting@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] interconnect: Add kunit tests for core functionality

The interconnect framework currently lacks in-tree unit tests to verify
the core logic in isolation. This makes it difficult to validate
regression stability when modifying the provider/consumer APIs or
aggregation logic.

Introduce a kunit test suite that verifies the fundamental behavior of
the subsystem. The tests cover:
- Provider API (node creation, linking, topology construction).
- Consumer API (path enabling/disabling, bandwidth requests).
- Standard aggregation logic (accumulating bandwidth across links).
- Bulk operations for setting bandwidth on multiple paths.

The suite simulates a simple SoC topology with multiple masters and a
shared bus to validate traffic aggregation behavior in a controlled
software environment, without requiring specific hardware or Device
Tree support.

Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
---
Build and kunit tests passed

 drivers/interconnect/Kconfig     |  14 ++
 drivers/interconnect/Makefile    |   2 +
 drivers/interconnect/icc-kunit.c | 315 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 331 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/interconnect/icc-kunit.c

diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
index f2e49bd97d31..882dcb0b4a5b 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/Kconfig
@@ -22,4 +22,18 @@ config INTERCONNECT_CLK
 	help
 	  Support for wrapping clocks into the interconnect nodes.
 
+config INTERCONNECT_KUNIT_TEST
+	tristate "KUnit tests for Interconnect framework"
+	depends on KUNIT
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  This builds the KUnit test suite for the generic system interconnect
+	  framework.
+
+	  The tests cover the core functionality of the interconnect subsystem,
+	  including provider/consumer APIs, topology management, and bandwidth
+	  aggregation logic.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 endif
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/Makefile b/drivers/interconnect/Makefile
index b0a9a6753b9d..dc4c7b657c9d 100644
--- a/drivers/interconnect/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/Makefile
@@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_QCOM)		+= qcom/
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_SAMSUNG)	+= samsung/
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_CLK)		+= icc-clk.o
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_INTERCONNECT_KUNIT_TEST) += icc-kunit.o
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/icc-kunit.c b/drivers/interconnect/icc-kunit.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2178487f9527
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/icc-kunit.c
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit tests for the Interconnect framework.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2025 Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
+ *
+ * This suite verifies the behavior of the interconnect core, including
+ * topology construction, bandwidth aggregation, and path lifecycle.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/platform_device.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "internal.h"
+
+enum {
+	NODE_CPU = 100,
+	NODE_GPU,
+	NODE_BUS,
+	NODE_DDR,
+	NODE_MAX
+};
+
+struct test_node_data {
+	int id;
+	const char *name;
+	int num_links;
+	int links[2];
+};
+
+/*
+ * Static Topology:
+ * CPU -\
+ * -> BUS -> DDR
+ * GPU -/
+ */
+static const struct test_node_data test_topology[] = {
+	{ NODE_CPU, "cpu", 1, { NODE_BUS } },
+	{ NODE_GPU, "gpu", 1, { NODE_BUS } },
+	{ NODE_BUS, "bus", 1, { NODE_DDR } },
+	{ NODE_DDR, "ddr", 0, { } },
+};
+
+struct icc_test_priv {
+	struct icc_provider provider;
+	struct platform_device *pdev;
+	struct icc_node *nodes[NODE_MAX];
+};
+
+static struct icc_node *get_node(struct icc_test_priv *priv, int id)
+{
+	int idx = id - NODE_CPU;
+
+	if (idx < 0 || idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(test_topology))
+		return NULL;
+	return priv->nodes[idx];
+}
+
+static int icc_test_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int icc_test_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 tag, u32 avg_bw,
+			      u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak)
+{
+	return icc_std_aggregate(node, tag, avg_bw, peak_bw, agg_avg, agg_peak);
+}
+
+static struct icc_node *icc_test_xlate(const struct of_phandle_args *spec, void *data)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int icc_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct icc_test_priv *priv;
+	struct icc_node *node;
+	int i, j, ret;
+
+	priv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv);
+	test->priv = priv;
+
+	priv->pdev = kunit_platform_device_alloc(test, "icc-test-dev", -1);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv->pdev);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, kunit_platform_device_add(test, priv->pdev), 0);
+
+	priv->provider.set = icc_test_set;
+	priv->provider.aggregate = icc_test_aggregate;
+	priv->provider.xlate = icc_test_xlate;
+	priv->provider.dev = &priv->pdev->dev;
+	priv->provider.data = priv;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->provider.nodes);
+
+	ret = icc_provider_register(&priv->provider);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_topology); i++) {
+		const struct test_node_data *data = &test_topology[i];
+
+		node = icc_node_create(data->id);
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, node);
+
+		node->name = data->name;
+		icc_node_add(node, &priv->provider);
+		priv->nodes[i] = node;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_topology); i++) {
+		const struct test_node_data *data = &test_topology[i];
+		struct icc_node *src = get_node(priv, data->id);
+
+		for (j = 0; j < data->num_links; j++) {
+			ret = icc_link_create(src, data->links[j]);
+			KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ret, 0, "Failed to link %s->%d",
+					    src->name, data->links[j]);
+		}
+	}
+
+	icc_sync_state(&priv->pdev->dev);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void icc_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct icc_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+
+	icc_nodes_remove(&priv->provider);
+	icc_provider_deregister(&priv->provider);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Helper to construct a mock path.
+ *
+ * Because we are bypassing icc_get(), we must manually link the requests
+ * to the nodes' req_list so that icc_std_aggregate() can discover them.
+ */
+static struct icc_path *icc_test_create_path(struct kunit *test,
+					     struct icc_node **nodes, int num)
+{
+	struct icc_path *path;
+	int i;
+
+	path = kunit_kzalloc(test, struct_size(path, reqs, num), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, path);
+
+	path->num_nodes = num;
+	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+		path->reqs[i].node = nodes[i];
+		hlist_add_head(&path->reqs[i].req_node, &nodes[i]->req_list);
+	}
+	path->name = "mock-path";
+
+	return path;
+}
+
+static void icc_test_destroy_path(struct kunit *test, struct icc_path *path)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < path->num_nodes; i++)
+		hlist_del(&path->reqs[i].req_node);
+
+	kunit_kfree(test, path);
+}
+
+static void icc_test_topology_integrity(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct icc_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	struct icc_node *cpu = get_node(priv, NODE_CPU);
+	struct icc_node *bus = get_node(priv, NODE_BUS);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, cpu->num_links, 1);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cpu->links[0], bus);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cpu->provider, &priv->provider);
+}
+
+static void icc_test_set_bw(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct icc_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	struct icc_path *path;
+	struct icc_node *path_nodes[3];
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Path: CPU -> BUS -> DDR */
+	path_nodes[0] = get_node(priv, NODE_CPU);
+	path_nodes[1] = get_node(priv, NODE_BUS);
+	path_nodes[2] = get_node(priv, NODE_DDR);
+
+	path = icc_test_create_path(test, path_nodes, 3);
+
+	ret = icc_enable(path);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	ret = icc_set_bw(path, 1000, 2000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, path_nodes[0]->avg_bw, 1000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, path_nodes[0]->peak_bw, 2000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, path_nodes[1]->avg_bw, 1000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, path_nodes[1]->peak_bw, 2000);
+
+	icc_set_tag(path, 0xABC);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, path->reqs[0].tag, 0xABC);
+
+	icc_disable(path);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, path_nodes[0]->avg_bw, 0);
+
+	icc_test_destroy_path(test, path);
+}
+
+static void icc_test_aggregation(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct icc_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	struct icc_path *path_cpu, *path_gpu;
+	struct icc_node *nodes_cpu[3], *nodes_gpu[2];
+	struct icc_node *bus = get_node(priv, NODE_BUS);
+	int ret;
+
+	nodes_cpu[0] = get_node(priv, NODE_CPU);
+	nodes_cpu[1] = bus;
+	nodes_cpu[2] = get_node(priv, NODE_DDR);
+	path_cpu = icc_test_create_path(test, nodes_cpu, 3);
+
+	nodes_gpu[0] = get_node(priv, NODE_GPU);
+	nodes_gpu[1] = bus;
+	path_gpu = icc_test_create_path(test, nodes_gpu, 2);
+
+	icc_enable(path_cpu);
+	icc_enable(path_gpu);
+
+	ret = icc_set_bw(path_cpu, 1000, 1000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bus->avg_bw, 1000);
+
+	ret = icc_set_bw(path_gpu, 2000, 2000);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+	/* Bus aggregates: CPU(1000) + GPU(2000) */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bus->avg_bw, 3000);
+	/* Peak aggregates: max(CPU, GPU) */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, bus->peak_bw, 2000);
+
+	icc_test_destroy_path(test, path_cpu);
+	icc_test_destroy_path(test, path_gpu);
+}
+
+static void icc_test_bulk_ops(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct icc_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
+	struct icc_node *nodes_cpu[3], *nodes_gpu[2];
+	struct icc_bulk_data bulk[2];
+	int ret;
+
+	nodes_cpu[0] = get_node(priv, NODE_CPU);
+	nodes_cpu[1] = get_node(priv, NODE_BUS);
+	nodes_cpu[2] = get_node(priv, NODE_DDR);
+
+	nodes_gpu[0] = get_node(priv, NODE_GPU);
+	nodes_gpu[1] = get_node(priv, NODE_BUS);
+
+	bulk[0].path = icc_test_create_path(test, nodes_cpu, 3);
+	bulk[0].avg_bw = 500;
+	bulk[0].peak_bw = 500;
+
+	bulk[1].path = icc_test_create_path(test, nodes_gpu, 2);
+	bulk[1].avg_bw = 600;
+	bulk[1].peak_bw = 600;
+
+	ret = icc_bulk_set_bw(2, bulk);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	/* Paths disabled, bandwidth should be 0 */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_node(priv, NODE_BUS)->avg_bw, 0);
+
+	ret = icc_bulk_enable(2, bulk);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+	/* Paths enabled, aggregation applies */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_node(priv, NODE_BUS)->avg_bw, 1100);
+
+	icc_bulk_disable(2, bulk);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, get_node(priv, NODE_BUS)->avg_bw, 0);
+
+	icc_test_destroy_path(test, bulk[0].path);
+	icc_test_destroy_path(test, bulk[1].path);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case icc_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(icc_test_topology_integrity),
+	KUNIT_CASE(icc_test_set_bw),
+	KUNIT_CASE(icc_test_aggregation),
+	KUNIT_CASE(icc_test_bulk_ops),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite icc_test_suite = {
+	.name = "interconnect",
+	.init = icc_test_init,
+	.exit = icc_test_exit,
+	.test_cases = icc_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(icc_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KUnit tests for the Interconnect framework");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.52.0.223.gf5cc29aaa4-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ