[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aTszzVJkIqBpYLst@CMGLRV3>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:12:45 -0600
From: Frederick Lawler <fred@...udflare.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>,
kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: xfs/ima: Regression caching i_version
On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 05:55:45AM +0900, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 14:29 -0600, Frederick Lawler wrote:
> > Hi Jeff,
> >
> > While testing 6.18, I think I found a regression with
> > commit 1cf7e834a6fb ("xfs: switch to multigrain timestamps") since 6.13
> > where IMA is no longer able to properly cache i_version when we overlay
> > tmpfs on top of XFS. Each measurement diff check in function
> > process_measurement() reports that the i_version is
> > always set to zero for iint->real_inode.version.
> >
> > The function ima_collect_measurement() is looking to extract the version
> > from the cookie on next measurement to cache i_version.
> >
> > I'm unclear from the commit description what the right approach here is:
> > update in IMA land by checking for time changes, or do
> > something else such as adding the cookie back.
> >
> >
>
> What we probably want to do is switch to using the ctime to manufacture
> a change attribute when STATX_CHANGE_ATTRIBUTE is not set in the statx
> reply.
>
> IIRC, IMA doesn't need to persist these values across reboot, so
> something like this (completely untested) might work, but it may be
> better to lift nfsd4_change_attribute() into a common header and use
> the same mechanism for both:
I agree lifting nfsd4_change_attribute(), if anything else, a consistent
place to fetch the i_version from. Am I correct in my understanding that
the XOR on the times will cancel out and result in just the i_version?
IMA is calling into inode_eq_iversion() to perform the comparison
between the cached value and inode.i_version.
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> index c35ea613c9f8..5a71845f579e 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c
> @@ -272,10 +272,14 @@ int ima_collect_measurement(struct ima_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file,
> * to an initial measurement/appraisal/audit, but was modified to
> * assume the file changed.
> */
> - result = vfs_getattr_nosec(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE,
> + result = vfs_getattr_nosec(&file->f_path, &stat, STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE | STATX_CTIME,
> AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT);
> - if (!result && (stat.result_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE))
> - i_version = stat.change_cookie;
> + if (!result) {
> + if (stat.result_mask & STATX_CHANGE_COOKIE)
> + i_version = stat.change_cookie;
> + else if (stat.result_mask & STATX_CTIME)
> + i_version = stat.ctime.tv_sec ^ stat.ctime.tv_nsec;
> + }
> hash.hdr.algo = algo;
> hash.hdr.length = hash_digest_size[algo];
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists