linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] clk: test: remove references to clk_ops.round

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20251212-clk-remove-round-rate-v1-1-5c3d5f3edc78@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:41:40 +0900
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
 Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, 
 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] clk: test: remove references to clk_ops.round_rate

The round_rate() clk ops is going away, so let's go ahead and remove any
references to it in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index a268d7b5d4cb28ec1f029f828c31107f8e130556..b1961daac5e22fb84f493f04feab1ff94a975d90 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -241,8 +241,8 @@ static void clk_test_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
  * Test that, after a call to clk_set_rate(), the rate returned by
  * clk_get_rate() matches.
  *
- * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't
- * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
+ * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate won't modify the requested rate,
+ * which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
  */
 static void clk_test_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
 {
@@ -266,8 +266,8 @@ static void clk_test_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
  * Test that, after several calls to clk_set_rate(), the rate returned
  * by clk_get_rate() matches the last one.
  *
- * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't
- * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
+ * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate won't modify the requested rate,
+ * which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
  */
 static void clk_test_set_set_get_rate(struct kunit *test)
 {
@@ -1675,8 +1675,8 @@ static void clk_range_test_set_range_set_round_rate_consistent_higher(struct kun
  * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be raised to match the
  * new minimum.
  *
- * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't
- * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
+ * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate won't modify the requested rate,
+ * which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
  */
 static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised(struct kunit *test)
 {
@@ -1707,8 +1707,8 @@ static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_raised(struct kunit *test)
  * call to clk_set_rate_range(), the rate will be lowered to match the
  * new maximum.
  *
- * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate or clk_ops.round_rate won't
- * modify the requested rate, which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
+ * This assumes that clk_ops.determine_rate won't modify the requested rate,
+ * which is our case in clk_dummy_rate_ops.
  */
 static void clk_range_test_set_range_get_rate_lowered(struct kunit *test)
 {

-- 
2.52.0