[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABb+yY0FJnunhxmapSXqZ=R_XeLOZkjUZLCRyt9s1zDhzFR7Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:01:54 -0600
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mailbox tree
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 5:49 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the mailbox tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/media/platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-core.c: In function 'mdp_probe':
> drivers/media/platform/mediatek/mdp3/mtk-mdp3-core.c:311:41: error: implicit declaration of function 'cmdq_get_shift_pa' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 311 | mdp->cmdq_shift_pa[i] = cmdq_get_shift_pa(mdp->cmdq_clt[i]->chan);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> e1fe978a07c7 ("mailbox: mtk-cmdq: Remove unsued cmdq_get_shift_pa()")
>
Jason, isn't your "Remove shift_pa from CMDQ jump functions" patchset
picked already?
Ideally this patch should have gone in that patchset. But if that pr
will be merged soon, maybe I can hold off mine. Otherwise, I will drop
this patch.
thanks
-Jassi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists