[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251211080517.GA28411@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 17:05:17 +0900
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] revocable: Add fops replacement
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 12:47:16PM +0900, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Replying late to this thread, I don't think this is right for V4L2. When
> > it comes to solving the .remove() vs. userspace race, I think the right
> > solution is at the cdev level.
>
> Isn't there even prototype code from Dan Williams?
>
> "[PATCH 1/3] cdev: Finish the cdev api with queued mode support"
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/20/997
I mentioned that in my LPC talk in 2022 :-) I think we should merge that
(or a rebased, possibly improved version of it). I've meant to try
plumbing that series in V4L2 but couldn't find the time so far.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists