[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xz4ukol5bvxmk2ctrjtvpyncipntjlf4bdr7kjdam2ig5gf7ho@vuuwwu7asj7i>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:30:06 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: Fix error code in
virtio_transport_recv_listen()
On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 10:45:47AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>Return a negative error code if the transport doesn't match. Don't
>return success.
>
>Fixes: c0cfa2d8a788 ("vsock: add multi-transports support")
>Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
>---
>>From static analysis. Not tested.
>
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index dcc8a1d5851e..77fbc6c541bf 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> release_sock(child);
> virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb);
> sock_put(child);
>- return ret;
>+ return ret ?: -EINVAL;
Thanks for this fix. I think we have a similar issue also in
net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c introduced by the same commit.
In net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c we have a similar pattern, but the
calling function return void, so no issue there.
Do you mind to fix also that one?
Sending a v2 to fix both or another patch just for that it's fine by me,
so:
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists