[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_3739CFB7F300BEAEBB928A0EB8D1C6875C09@qq.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 16:36:12 +0800
From: Yuwen Chen <ywen.chen@...mail.com>
To: andrealmeid@...lia.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: edliaw@...gle.com,
dave@...olabs.net,
dbueso@...e.de,
dvhart@...radead.org,
hpa@...ux.intel.com,
justinstitt@...gle.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
luto@....edu,
mingo@...hat.com,
morbo@...gle.com,
nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
peterz@...radead.org,
shuah@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de,
usama.anjum@...labora.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] selftests/futex: fix the issue of abnormal test results caused by thread timing
On the Android arm32 platform, when performing the futex_requeue test, it will
most likely return a failure. The specific reason is detailed in a commit[1]
previously submitted by Edward Liaw. However, this commit cannot perfectly
solve the problem. This is because using a barrier does not guarantee that
the child thread will wait on futex_wait.
This series of patches attempts to solve this problem by checking whether
the child thread is in a sleeping state. This is because when the child thread
goes to sleep, it indicates that it is waiting for the futex lock.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240918231102.234253-1-edliaw@google.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists