linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Amlogic T7 SCMI clock controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1j8qf92zf6.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:30:37 +0100
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,  Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>,
  Chuan Liu <chuan.liu@...ogic.com>,  Neil Armstrong
 <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,  Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
  Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,  Michael Turquette
 <mturquette@...libre.com>,  robh+dt <robh+dt@...nel.org>,  Rob Herring
 <robh@...nel.org>,  devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,  linux-clk
 <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,  linux-amlogic
 <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,  linux-kernel
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,  linux-arm-kernel
 <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Amlogic T7 SCMI clock
 controller

On Thu 11 Dec 2025 at 07:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:


>> 
>> Is there a new requirement to submit the DTS file changes along with the
>> driver changes now ?
>> 
>> This has never been case before, especially since the changes are merged
>> through different trees.
>
> There is no such requirement, but "has never been case before" is
> clearly not accurate, because I raised this question multiple times last
> two-three years.
>
> There is no reasonable way to hold publishing of DTS, therefore if
> someone uses arguments like above with waiting for driver, I usually got
> suspicious.
>
> Also note, that many contributions from various people (not saying that
> this one here is) were bad quality and badly designed but without seeing
> DTS it takes me significantly more time to understand that design. So
> yes, publish your DTS solving all of the questions and making reviewing
> easier. Or don't and receive questions...
>

That's fair. Thanks for clarifying.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
Jerome