linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: Enable cpufreq cooling devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f370e56b-21e7-49a7-944d-b7c10b3ea628@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 16:45:11 +0530
From: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: Enable cpufreq cooling devices


On 12/10/2025 1:45 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 12:37:05PM +0530, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>> On 12/10/2025 1:38 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Are there any cooling maps to be defined?
>>
>> We need it to configure from userspace daemon.
> You are describing behaviour. Please describe the hardware instead.


you mean without defining cooling map for cpu, we should not add 
cooling-cells to cpu?

thanks
Gaurav