lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b1fb854a90cca58d65443cba3d2883b73aea0fc.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:35:57 +0000
From: Chris Lu (陸稚泓) <Chris.Lu@...iatek.com>
To: "luiz.dentz@...il.com" <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
CC: Will-CY Lee (李政穎) <Will-CY.Lee@...iatek.com>,
	Steve Lee (李視誠) <steve.lee@...iatek.com>,
	"marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	SS Wu (巫憲欣) <ss.wu@...iatek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"johan.hedberg@...il.com" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, Sean Wang
	<Sean.Wang@...iatek.com>, "linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: btmtk: Trigger reset on firmware download
 failure

Hi Luiz,

Thanks for your review and response.

On Wed, 2025-12-10 at 16:09 -0500, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 7:06 AM Chris Lu <chris.lu@...iatek.com>
> wrote:
> > 
> > Initiate reset flow if MT79xx series BT failed to download firmware
> > when
> > doing setup.
> > If driver is not able to get event after reset in the first section
> > of
> > btmtk_usb_setup, the protocol is deemed unuable and driver will
> > return to
> > prevent from repeatedly executing resets.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Lu <chris.lu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c | 11 +++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> > index a8c520dc09e1..8b1443b9e9cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.c
> > @@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int btmtk_usb_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >                                                
> > btmtk_usb_hci_wmt_sync);
> >                 if (err < 0) {
> >                         bt_dev_err(hdev, "Failed to set up firmware
> > (%d)", err);
> > -                       return err;
> > +                       goto reset_fw;
> >                 }
> > 
> >                 /* It's Device EndPoint Reset Option Register */
> > @@ -1353,7 +1353,7 @@ int btmtk_usb_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >                 err = btmtk_usb_hci_wmt_sync(hdev, &wmt_params);
> >                 if (err < 0) {
> >                         bt_dev_err(hdev, "Failed to send wmt func
> > ctrl (%d)", err);
> > -                       return err;
> > +                       goto reset_fw;
> >                 }
> > 
> >                 hci_set_msft_opcode(hdev, 0xFD30);
> > @@ -1444,6 +1444,13 @@ int btmtk_usb_setup(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >         }
> >         kfree_skb(skb);
> > 
> > +reset_fw:
> > +       if (btmtk_data->reset_sync) {
> > +               bt_dev_err(hdev, "Mediatek do firmware reset");
> 
> This message is a bit cryptic to me, why do we need to print that you
> will be doing a reset?

Indeed, this log can only be interpreted by Mediatek engineers. I'll
update v2 to remove this line.

> 
> > +               btmtk_reset_sync(hdev);
> 
> This seems to be doing a hard reset, which I assume you are doing as
> an attempt to recover by retrying to setup, but if it fails we may go
> into a loop condition trying to setup so we better limit the number
> of
> attempts.

We only perform reset once when firmware download failed or 'wmt ctrl'
command failed.

Before downloading the firmware, driver will send pre-init commands to
get information such as chip id, after the reset, if those command
still can't work normally, it is considered a protocol issue that it
can't be further used. We'll not enter the reset flow again to avoid an
endless loop.

There is indeed a potential risk. If the pre-init commands are all fine
but firmware download continues to have problem, it could cause a loop
condition. Retry limit will be addressed in v2.

> 
> > +               return err;
> > +       }
> > +
> >  done:
> >         rettime = ktime_get();
> >         delta = ktime_sub(rettime, calltime);
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Thanks a lot!
Chris Lu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ