[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251211120441.GG3911114@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 13:04:41 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Chris Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/35] compiler-context-analysis: Add infrastructure
for Context Analysis with Clang
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 03:49:04PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> +/**
> + * context_guard_struct() - declare or define a context guard struct
> + * @name: struct name
> + *
> + * Helper to declare or define a struct type that is also a context guard.
> + *
> + * .. code-block:: c
> + *
> + * context_guard_struct(my_handle) {
> + * int foo;
> + * long bar;
> + * };
> + *
> + * struct some_state {
> + * ...
> + * };
> + * // ... declared elsewhere ...
> + * context_guard_struct(some_state);
> + *
> + * Note: The implementation defines several helper functions that can acquire
> + * and release the context guard.
> + */
> +# define context_guard_struct(name, ...) \
> + struct __ctx_guard_type(name) __VA_ARGS__ name; \
> + static __always_inline void __acquire_ctx_guard(const struct name *var) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __no_context_analysis __acquires_ctx_guard(var) { } \
> + static __always_inline void __acquire_shared_ctx_guard(const struct name *var) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __no_context_analysis __acquires_shared_ctx_guard(var) { } \
> + static __always_inline bool __try_acquire_ctx_guard(const struct name *var, bool ret) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __no_context_analysis __try_acquires_ctx_guard(1, var) \
> + { return ret; } \
> + static __always_inline bool __try_acquire_shared_ctx_guard(const struct name *var, bool ret) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __no_context_analysis __try_acquires_shared_ctx_guard(1, var) \
> + { return ret; } \
> + static __always_inline void __release_ctx_guard(const struct name *var) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __no_context_analysis __releases_ctx_guard(var) { } \
> + static __always_inline void __release_shared_ctx_guard(const struct name *var) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __no_context_analysis __releases_shared_ctx_guard(var) { } \
> + static __always_inline void __assume_ctx_guard(const struct name *var) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __assumes_ctx_guard(var) { } \
> + static __always_inline void __assume_shared_ctx_guard(const struct name *var) \
> + __attribute__((overloadable)) __assumes_shared_ctx_guard(var) { } \
> + struct name
-typedef struct {
+context_guard_struct(rwlock) {
struct rwbase_rt rwbase;
atomic_t readers;
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
#endif
-} rwlock_t;
+};
+typedef struct rwlock rwlock_t;
I must say I find the 'guard' naming here somewhat confusing. This is
not a guard, but an actual lock type.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists