[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <syaaw5p5nyx3bgp4xrzzb4zze5ljelesfaxzuify7pgo7f3m2n@ooxqgjji73ri>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:51:06 +0800
From: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@...e.com>
To: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
Cc: mark@...heh.com, jlbec@...lplan.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+6d832e79d3efe1c46743@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: validate i_refcount_loc when refcount flag is set
On Mon, Dec 08, 2025 at 02:14:07PM +0530, Deepanshu Kartikey wrote:
> Add validation in ocfs2_validate_inode_block() to check that if an
> inode has OCFS2_HAS_REFCOUNT_FL set, it must also have a valid
> i_refcount_loc. A corrupted filesystem image can have this inconsistent
> state, which later triggers a BUG_ON in ocfs2_remove_refcount_tree()
> when the inode is being wiped during unlink.
>
> Catch this corruption early during inode validation to fail gracefully
> instead of crashing the kernel.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+6d832e79d3efe1c46743@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+6d832e79d3efe1c46743@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=6d832e79d3efe1c46743
> Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> index 78f81950c9ee..dd56407fc056 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c
> @@ -1484,6 +1484,13 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb,
> goto bail;
> }
>
> + if ((di->i_dyn_features & cpu_to_le16(OCFS2_HAS_REFCOUNT_FL)) &&
> + !di->i_refcount_loc) {
> + rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode #%llu: refcount flag set but i_refcount_loc is zero\n",
> + (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr);
> + goto bail;
> + }
> +
The code logic looks good to me, but please run "kernel/scripts/checkpatch.pl"
on the patch before sending it out. We can see that the line length is too long.
Thanks,
Heming
> rc = 0;
>
> bail:
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists