[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a0dbc9d-0ed4-4a4c-8b5d-5779d07761a2@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 18:47:16 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>
Cc: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Concerns with em.yaml YNL spec
> It is covered by the Documentation/netlink/ entry:
>
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl Documentation/netlink/specs/em.yaml
> Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> (maintainer:ENERGY MODEL)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> (maintainer:ENERGY MODEL)
> Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com> (maintainer:YAML NETLINK (YNL))
> Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> (maintainer:YAML NETLINK (YNL))
Yep. So it should of gone flying passed on the netdev list.
But it did not:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251014001055.772422-4-changwoo@igalia.com/
Very little of what get_maintainers suggest should be in Cc: is
actually in Cc: :-(
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists