linux-kernel - [PATCH RFC net-next 06/13] dpll: Support dynamic pin index allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251211194756.234043-7-ivecera@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 20:47:49 +0100
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
	Grzegorz Nitka <grzegorz.nitka@...el.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	Petr Oros <poros@...hat.com>,
	Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
	Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
	Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
	Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next 06/13] dpll: Support dynamic pin index allocation

Allow drivers to register DPLL pins without manually specifying a pin
index.

Currently, drivers must provide a unique pin index when calling
dpll_pin_get(). This works well for hardware-mapped pins but creates
friction for drivers handling virtual pins or those without a strict
hardware indexing scheme.

Introduce DPLL_PIN_IDX_UNSPEC (U32_MAX). When a driver passes this
value as the pin index:
1. The core allocates a unique index using an IDA
2. The allocated index is mapped to a range starting above `INT_MAX`

This separation ensures that dynamically allocated indices never collide
with standard driver-provided hardware indices, which are assumed to be
within the `0` to `INT_MAX` range. The index is automatically freed when
the pin is released in dpll_pin_put().

Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/dpll.h     |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
index fecc3d97acf5b..79f60e0de27ac 100644
--- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
+++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/idr.h>
 #include <linux/property.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
@@ -24,6 +25,7 @@ DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(dpll_device_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
 DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(dpll_pin_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
 
 static RAW_NOTIFIER_HEAD(dpll_notifier_chain);
+static DEFINE_IDA(dpll_pin_idx_ida);
 
 static u32 dpll_device_xa_id;
 static u32 dpll_pin_xa_id;
@@ -468,6 +470,36 @@ void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_unregister);
 
+static int dpll_pin_idx_alloc(u32 *pin_idx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!pin_idx)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Alloc unique number from IDA. Number belongs to <0, INT_MAX> range */
+	ret = ida_alloc(&dpll_pin_idx_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Map the value to dynamic pin index range <INT_MAX+1, U32_MAX> */
+	*pin_idx = (u32)ret + INT_MAX + 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void dpll_pin_idx_free(u32 pin_idx)
+{
+	if (pin_idx <= INT_MAX)
+		return; /* Not a dynamic pin index */
+
+	/* Map the index value from dynamic pin index range to IDA range and
+	 * free it.
+	 */
+	pin_idx -= INT_MAX - 1;
+	ida_free(&dpll_pin_idx_ida, pin_idx);
+}
+
 static void dpll_pin_prop_free(struct dpll_pin_properties *prop)
 {
 	kfree(prop->package_label);
@@ -526,9 +558,18 @@ dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct module *module,
 	struct dpll_pin *pin;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (pin_idx == DPLL_PIN_IDX_UNSPEC) {
+		ret = dpll_pin_idx_alloc(&pin_idx);
+		if (ret)
+			return ERR_PTR(ret);
+	} else if (pin_idx > INT_MAX) {
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
 	pin = kzalloc(sizeof(*pin), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pin)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	if (!pin) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_pin_alloc;
+	}
 	pin->pin_idx = pin_idx;
 	pin->clock_id = clock_id;
 	pin->module = module;
@@ -557,6 +598,8 @@ dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u32 pin_idx, struct module *module,
 	dpll_pin_prop_free(&pin->prop);
 err_pin_prop:
 	kfree(pin);
+err_pin_alloc:
+	dpll_pin_idx_free(pin_idx);
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 }
 
@@ -663,6 +706,7 @@ void dpll_pin_put(struct dpll_pin *pin)
 		xa_destroy(&pin->ref_sync_pins);
 		dpll_pin_prop_free(&pin->prop);
 		fwnode_handle_put(pin->fwnode);
+		dpll_pin_idx_free(pin->pin_idx);
 		kfree_rcu(pin, rcu);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&dpll_lock);
diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
index 441afb90d2a29..8aa1df38ce563 100644
--- a/include/linux/dpll.h
+++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
@@ -235,6 +235,8 @@ int dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, enum dpll_type type,
 void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll,
 			    const struct dpll_device_ops *ops, void *priv);
 
+#define DPLL_PIN_IDX_UNSPEC	U32_MAX
+
 struct dpll_pin *
 dpll_pin_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module,
 	     const struct dpll_pin_properties *prop,
-- 
2.51.2