[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251212051658.1618543-7-csander@purestorage.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 22:16:56 -0700
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] selftests: ublk: forbid multiple data copy modes
The kublk mock ublk server allows multiple data copy mode arguments to
be passed on the command line (--zero_copy, --get_data, and --auto_zc).
The ublk device will be created with all the requested feature flags,
however kublk will only use one of the modes to interact with request
data (arbitrarily preferring auto_zc over zero_copy over get_data). To
clarify the intent of the test, don't allow multiple data copy modes to
be specified. --zero_copy and --auto_zc are allowed together for
--auto_zc_fallback, which uses both copy modes.
Don't set UBLK_F_USER_COPY for zero_copy, as it's a separate feature.
Fix the test cases in test_stress_05 passing --get_data along with
--zero_copy or --auto_zc.
Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c | 11 ++++++++++-
tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh | 10 +++++-----
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
index f8fa102a627f..4dd02cb083ba 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/kublk.c
@@ -1611,11 +1611,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
break;
case 'd':
ctx.queue_depth = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
break;
case 'z':
- ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY | UBLK_F_USER_COPY;
+ ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY;
break;
case 'r':
value = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
if (value)
ctx.flags |= UBLK_F_USER_RECOVERY;
@@ -1684,10 +1684,19 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
"F_AUTO_BUF_REG nor F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY is enabled\n",
__func__);
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (!!(ctx.flags & UBLK_F_NEED_GET_DATA) +
+ !!(ctx.flags & UBLK_F_USER_COPY) +
+ (ctx.flags & UBLK_F_SUPPORT_ZERO_COPY && !ctx.auto_zc_fallback) +
+ (ctx.flags & UBLK_F_AUTO_BUF_REG && !ctx.auto_zc_fallback) +
+ ctx.auto_zc_fallback > 1) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "too many data copy modes specified\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
i = optind;
while (i < argc && ctx.nr_files < MAX_BACK_FILES) {
ctx.files[ctx.nr_files++] = argv[i++];
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh
index 274295061042..68a194144302 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_stress_05.sh
@@ -56,21 +56,21 @@ for reissue in $(seq 0 1); do
wait
done
if _have_feature "ZERO_COPY"; then
for reissue in $(seq 0 1); do
- ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -g -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
- ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 -g -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" "${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
+ ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
+ ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 -z -r 1 -i "$reissue" "${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
wait
done
fi
if _have_feature "AUTO_BUF_REG"; then
for reissue in $(seq 0 1); do
- ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -g --auto_zc -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
- ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 -g --auto_zc -r 1 -i "$reissue" "${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
- ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -g -z --auto_zc --auto_zc_fallback -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
+ ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 --auto_zc -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
+ ublk_io_and_remove 256M -t loop -q 4 --auto_zc -r 1 -i "$reissue" "${UBLK_BACKFILES[1]}" &
+ ublk_io_and_remove 8G -t null -q 4 -z --auto_zc --auto_zc_fallback -r 1 -i "$reissue" &
wait
done
fi
if _have_feature "PER_IO_DAEMON"; then
--
2.45.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists