[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErzpmv4U5_VMq3nBeLduKaVMdDRL0d8MQoH9Rafpy4hmbmnsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 10:14:48 +0800
From: Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pengdonglin <pengdonglin@...omi.com>, Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] tracing: Update funcgraph-retval documentation
On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 8:14 PM Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
>
> The existing documentation for funcgraph-retval is outdated and partially
> incorrect, as it describes limitations that have now been resolved.
>
> Recent changes (e.g., using BTF to obtain function return types) have
> addressed key issues:
> 1. Return values are now printed only for non-void functions.
> 2. Values are trimmed to the correct width of the return type, avoiding
> garbage data from high bits.
>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: Xiaoqin Zhang <zhangxiaoqin@...omi.com>
> Signed-off-by: pengdonglin <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
> ---
> Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
> index d1f313a5f4ad..03c8c433c803 100644
> --- a/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst
> @@ -1454,6 +1454,10 @@ Options for function_graph tracer:
> printed in hexadecimal format. By default, this option
> is off.
>
> + funcgraph-retaddr
> + When set, the return address will always be printed.
> + By default, this option is off.
> +
> sleep-time
> When running function graph tracer, to include
> the time a task schedules out in its function.
> @@ -2800,7 +2804,7 @@ It is default disabled.
> 0) 2.861 us | } /* putname() */
>
> The return value of each traced function can be displayed after
> -an equal sign "=". When encountering system call failures, it
> +an equal sign "ret =". When encountering system call failures, it
> can be very helpful to quickly locate the function that first
> returns an error code.
>
> @@ -2810,16 +2814,16 @@ returns an error code.
> Example with funcgraph-retval::
>
> 1) | cgroup_migrate() {
> - 1) 0.651 us | cgroup_migrate_add_task(); /* = 0xffff93fcfd346c00 */
> + 1) 0.651 us | cgroup_migrate_add_task(); /* ret=0xffff93fcfd346c00 */
> 1) | cgroup_migrate_execute() {
> 1) | cpu_cgroup_can_attach() {
> 1) | cgroup_taskset_first() {
> - 1) 0.732 us | cgroup_taskset_next(); /* = 0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> - 1) 1.232 us | } /* cgroup_taskset_first = 0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> - 1) 0.380 us | sched_rt_can_attach(); /* = 0x0 */
> - 1) 2.335 us | } /* cpu_cgroup_can_attach = -22 */
> - 1) 4.369 us | } /* cgroup_migrate_execute = -22 */
> - 1) 7.143 us | } /* cgroup_migrate = -22 */
> + 1) 0.732 us | cgroup_taskset_next(); /* ret=0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> + 1) 1.232 us | } /* cgroup_taskset_first ret=0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> + 1) 0.380 us | sched_rt_can_attach(); /* ret=0x0 */
> + 1) 2.335 us | } /* cpu_cgroup_can_attach ret=-22 */
> + 1) 4.369 us | } /* cgroup_migrate_execute ret=-22 */
> + 1) 7.143 us | } /* cgroup_migrate ret=-22 */
>
> The above example shows that the function cpu_cgroup_can_attach
> returned the error code -22 firstly, then we can read the code
> @@ -2836,37 +2840,41 @@ printed in hexadecimal format.
> Example with funcgraph-retval-hex::
>
> 1) | cgroup_migrate() {
> - 1) 0.651 us | cgroup_migrate_add_task(); /* = 0xffff93fcfd346c00 */
> + 1) 0.651 us | cgroup_migrate_add_task(); /* ret=0xffff93fcfd346c00 */
> 1) | cgroup_migrate_execute() {
> 1) | cpu_cgroup_can_attach() {
> 1) | cgroup_taskset_first() {
> - 1) 0.732 us | cgroup_taskset_next(); /* = 0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> - 1) 1.232 us | } /* cgroup_taskset_first = 0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> - 1) 0.380 us | sched_rt_can_attach(); /* = 0x0 */
> - 1) 2.335 us | } /* cpu_cgroup_can_attach = 0xffffffea */
> - 1) 4.369 us | } /* cgroup_migrate_execute = 0xffffffea */
> + 1) 0.732 us | cgroup_taskset_next(); /* ret=0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> + 1) 1.232 us | } /* cgroup_taskset_first ret=0xffff93fc8fb20000 */
> + 1) 0.380 us | sched_rt_can_attach(); /* ret=0x0 */
> + 1) 2.335 us | } /* cpu_cgroup_can_attach ret=0xffffffea */
> + 1) 4.369 us | } /* cgroup_migrate_execute ret=0xffffffea */
> 1) 7.143 us | } /* cgroup_migrate = 0xffffffea */
My bad for forgetting to update the above line and will fix it in the
next version.
>
> -At present, there are some limitations when using the funcgraph-retval
> -option, and these limitations will be eliminated in the future:
> +Note that there are some limitations when using the funcgraph-retval
> +option:
> +
> +- If CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is disabled (n), a return value is printed even for
> + functions with a void return type. When CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled (y),
> + the return value is printed only for non-void functions.
>
> -- Even if the function return type is void, a return value will still
> - be printed, and you can just ignore it.
> +- If a return value occupies multiple registers, only the value in the first
> + register is recorded and printed. For example, on the x86 architecture, a
> + 64-bit return value is stored across eax (lower 32 bits) and edx (upper 32 bits),
> + but only the contents of eax are captured. If CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled,
> + the suffix "(trunc)" is appended to the printed value to indicate that the
> + output may be truncated because high-order register contents are omitted.
>
> -- Even if return values are stored in multiple registers, only the
> - value contained in the first register will be recorded and printed.
> - To illustrate, in the x86 architecture, eax and edx are used to store
> - a 64-bit return value, with the lower 32 bits saved in eax and the
> - upper 32 bits saved in edx. However, only the value stored in eax
> - will be recorded and printed.
> +- Under certain procedure-call standards (e.g., arm64's AAPCS64), when the return
> + type is smaller than a general-purpose register (GPR), the caller is responsible
> + for narrowing the value; the upper bits of the register may contain undefined data.
> + For instance, when a u8 is returned in 64-bit GPR, bits [63:8] can hold arbitrary
> + values, especially when larger types are truncated (explicitly or implicitly). It
> + is therefore advisable to inspect the code in such cases. If CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
> + is enabled (y), the return value is automatically trimmed to the width of the return
> + type.
>
> -- In certain procedure call standards, such as arm64's AAPCS64, when a
> - type is smaller than a GPR, it is the responsibility of the consumer
> - to perform the narrowing, and the upper bits may contain UNKNOWN values.
> - Therefore, it is advisable to check the code for such cases. For instance,
> - when using a u8 in a 64-bit GPR, bits [63:8] may contain arbitrary values,
> - especially when larger types are truncated, whether explicitly or implicitly.
> - Here are some specific cases to illustrate this point:
> + The following examples illustrate the behavior:
>
> **Case One**:
>
> @@ -2885,7 +2893,9 @@ option, and these limitations will be eliminated in the future:
> RET
>
> If you pass 0x123456789abcdef to this function and want to narrow it,
> - it may be recorded as 0x123456789abcdef instead of 0xef.
> + it may be recorded as 0x123456789abcdef instead of 0xef. When
> + CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled, the value will be correctly truncated
> + to 0xef based on the size constraints of the u8 type.
>
> **Case Two**:
>
> @@ -2910,7 +2920,9 @@ option, and these limitations will be eliminated in the future:
> RET
>
> When passing 0x2_0000_0000 to it, the return value may be recorded as
> - 0x2_0000_0000 instead of 0.
> + 0x2_0000_0000 instead of 0. When CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is enabled, the
> + value will be correctly truncated to 0 based on the size constraints of
> + the int type.
>
> You can put some comments on specific functions by using
> trace_printk() For example, if you want to put a comment inside
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists