linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: realtek: increase rtl822x_c45_soft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0163c5f3-44a5-4b2a-aeb6-ce924e9a7492@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 20:29:20 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Shiji Yang <yangshiji66@...look.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: realtek: increase
 rtl822x_c45_soft_reset() poll timeout

On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 11:21:30PM +0800, Shiji Yang wrote:
> It's noticed that sometimes RTL8221B-VB-CG cannot be reset properly.
> Increase the polling timeout value to fix this issue. The generic
> phy reset function genphy_soft_reset() also uses 600ms as the timeout
> threshold.

Should this be considered a fix and back ported to stable? If so,
please target net, and add a Fixes: tag.

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr