linux-kernel - Re: Concerns with em.yaml YNL spec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73d24d31-f852-4722-b40e-ac44032e913e@igalia.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2025 20:38:22 +0900
From: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
To: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, Lukasz Luba
 <lukasz.luba@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Concerns with em.yaml YNL spec



On 12/14/25 20:14, Changwoo Min wrote:

>> - I think the spec could have been called energy-model.yaml and the
>> family called "energy-model" instead of "em".
>>
>> - the get-pds should probably be both do and dump which would give
>> multi responses without the need for the pds attribute set (unless I'm
>> missing something).
>  >
> 

Will change as you suggested.

Regards,
Changwoo Min