[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bqxwr6mbyhgstdidmhvz7cbojkdizmlrsdu3x7cfj3n4xt5nuy@h7imqnipzihl>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 19:00:19 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, jack@...e.cz,
Deepakkumar Karn <dkarn@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/buffer: add alert in try_to_free_buffers() for
folios without buffers
On Mon 15-12-25 14:10:08, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 03:07:35PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 18:42:11 +0530, Deepakkumar Karn wrote:
> > > try_to_free_buffers() can be called on folios with no buffers attached
> > > when filemap_release_folio() is invoked on a folio belonging to a mapping
> > > with AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS set but no release_folio operation defined.
> > >
> > > In such cases, folio_needs_release() returns true because of the
> > > AS_RELEASE_ALWAYS flag, but the folio has no private buffer data. This
> > > causes try_to_free_buffers() to call drop_buffers() on a folio with no
> > > buffers, leading to a null pointer dereference.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied to the vfs-7.0.misc branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
> > Patches in the vfs-7.0.misc branch should appear in linux-next soon.
>
> No, this is the wrong fix. Please drop.
Nobody says this is a fix (it has WARN_ON() in it after all). But it's a
sensible hardening regardless of other changes we do in this area. After our
discussion I agree that the change to mapping_set_release_always() is not
needed if we instead rework how .release_folio (and try_to_free_buffers())
is called but this is a separate change...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists