[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251215204624.GE905277@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:46:24 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Dipendra Khadka <kdipendra88@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcg: reorder retry checks for clarity in
try_charge_memcg
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 02:54:19PM +0000, Dipendra Khadka wrote:
> In try_charge_memcg(), reorder the retry logic checks to follow the
> early-exit pattern by testing for dying task before decrementing the
> retry counter:
>
> Before:
> if (nr_retries--)
> goto retry;
>
> if (passed_oom && task_is_dying())
> goto nomem;
>
> After:
> if (passed_oom && task_is_dying())
> goto nomem;
>
> if (nr_retries--)
> goto retry;
>
> This makes the control flow more obvious: check exit conditions first,
> then decide whether to retry. When current task is dying (e.g., has
> received SIGKILL or is exiting), we should exit immediately rather than
> consuming a retry count first.
>
> No functional change for the common case where task is not dying.
It's definitely a functional change, not just code clarification.
The oom kill resets nr_retries. This means that currently, even an OOM
victim is going to retry a full set of reclaims, even if they are
hopeless. After your patch, it'll retry for other reasons but can bail
much earlier as well. Check the other conditions.
The dying task / OOM victim allocation path is tricky and it tends to
fail us in the rarest and most difficult to debug scenarios. There
should be a good reason to change it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists