linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] tee: qcomtee: call: Fix confusing cleanup.h syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <178f4564-8b59-4cf0-8274-dba7e58ba596@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:11:41 -0800
From: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Amirreza Zarrabi <amirreza.zarrabi@....qualcomm.com>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tee: qcomtee: call: Fix confusing cleanup.h syntax

On 12/11/2025 5:39 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2025 at 02:07:40AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Sure, fair. I just don't get why introducing cleanup.h without actually
>> accepting its explicitly documented style...
> TBH, it is likely overlooked during review of the QTEE driver. Having a
> builtin warning for the undesired syntax would help the reviewers here.

It is in the works:
https://patch.msgid.link/20251203-aheev-checkpatch-uninitialized-free-v7-1-841e3b31d8f3@gmail.com