[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aT-0zW7vOrJv6pA6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 08:12:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org,
void@...ifault.com, arighi@...dia.com, changwoo@...lia.com,
sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rq_modified_clear’ (was [PATCH 5/5] sched: Rework
sched_class::wakeup_preempt() and rq_modified_*())
* Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> wrote:
> On 11/27/25 16:39, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Change sched_class::wakeup_preempt() to also get called for
> > cross-class wakeups, specifically those where the woken task is of a
> > higher class than the previous highest class.
>
> I suspect you might be aware of this already, but this patch afaics
> broke compilation of today's -next for me, as reverting fixed things.
Yeah, sorry about that, I fumbled a conflict resolution - should be
fixed for tomorrow's -next.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists