[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86ms3knl6s.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 09:33:47 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org,
broonie@...nel.org,
oliver.upton@...ux.dev,
miko.lenczewski@....com,
kevin.brodsky@....com,
ardb@...nel.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org,
yangyicong@...ilicon.com,
scott@...amperecomputing.com,
joey.gouly@....com,
yuzenghui@...wei.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com,
shuah@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com,
arnd@...db.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 RESEND 9/9] arm64: armv8_deprecated: apply FEAT_LSUI for swpX emulation.
On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 11:22:48 +0000,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com> wrote:
>
> Apply the FEAT_LSUI instruction to emulate the deprecated swpX
> instruction, so that toggling of the PSTATE.PAN bit can be removed when
> LSUI-related instructions are used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@....com>
It really begs the question: what are the odds of ever seeing a CPU
that implements both LSUI and AArch32?
This seems extremely unlikely to me.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists