[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251215121518.000020dd@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 12:15:18 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: <dave.jiang@...el.com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, <terry.bowman@....com>,
<alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Alejandro
Lucero <alucerop@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] cxl/mem: Drop @host argument to
devm_cxl_add_memdev()
On Wed, 3 Dec 2025 18:21:35 -0800
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> In all cases the device that created the 'struct cxl_dev_state' instance is
> also the device to host the devm cleanup of devm_cxl_add_memdev(). This
> simplifies the function prototype, and limits a degree of freedom of the
> API.
>
> Cc: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
> Cc: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Fair enough. I'm not hugely keen on a devm_ first parameter not
being the dev, but constraining that interface is probably worth
the small amount of thought this requires.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists