linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+HBbNFzETiySdw-VuzMJx6vdhPU_3d_aU2v9eJ4-_OBaTn2mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:31:00 +0100
From: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	conor+dt@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, 
	mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, daniel.machon@...rochip.com, 
	UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x support

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 1:32 PM Nicolas Ferre
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> On 15/12/2025 at 12:36, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 8:21 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 01:21:32PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> >>> Add support for Microchip LAN969x switch SoC, including the EV23X71A
> >>> EVB board.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
> >>> ---
> >>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile        |   2 +
> >>>   .../boot/dts/microchip/lan9696-ev23x71a.dts   | 761 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/microchip/lan969x.dtsi    | 482 +++++++++++
> >>
> >> The majority of devices in this file are missing soc-specific
> >> compatibles.
> >
> > Hi,
> > I missed this before.
> >
> > The majority of the devices are simply reused from the AT91 series, so
> > I thought it was not required to
> > update all of the bindings to add the LAN9691 compatible.
> >
> > If that is required, I will do so in v2.
> Well, history told us it was better (in addition to be required by DT
> best practices). Indeed, even if the same IP block is used, sometimes
> integration subtleties pay game with us and a dedicated compatible
> string saves us.

Ok, I will then update the required bindings and include them in the
series in v2.

Regards,
Robert
>
> Regards,
>    Nicolas



-- 
Robert Marko
Staff Embedded Linux Engineer
Sartura d.d.
Lendavska ulica 16a
10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Email: robert.marko@...tura.hr
Web: www.sartura.hr