lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiNkxDCQHvB4L2TyFZp7yBnDiuWW3WNhFLB08u-Y-nEhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 15:19:58 +1200
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	"Ahmed S . Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, 
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, 
	John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 0/15] x86: Remove support for TSC-less and CX8-less CPUs

On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 at 14:39, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Does this also eliminate all processors that do not support CPUID?

I do think it does, as it's also the only way to enumerate both TSC
and CX8, afaik, so the whole "require CX8" effectively also requires
cpuid.

So it probably means we can get rid of all the X86_EFLAGS_ID checks too.

            Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ