[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e596f624-b4da-4c93-910c-b3c35917eb9c@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:33:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>, Anup Patel
<anup@...infault.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>,
Kevin Meng Zhang <zhangmeng.kevin@...ux.spacemit.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, spacemit@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: riscv: add SpacemiT X100 CPU compatible
On 16/12/2025 14:32, Guodong Xu wrote:
> Add compatible string for the SpacemiT X100 (RVA23 compliant) core.
>
> Link: https://www.spacemit.com/en/spacemit-x100-core/
>
> Signed-off-by: Guodong Xu <guodong@...cstar.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> index d733c0bd534fb63ed7c0eada97c42832431f1fc1..cce87092dc7749f49066154d9a256af6c7b6c19f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ properties:
> - sifive,u74
> - sifive,u74-mc
> - spacemit,x60
> + - spacemit,x100
Two reviews of this one-liner but no one pointed out that sorting is
broken... What is being exactly reviewed in this one-liner?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists