lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQtYSpw15JM_1Yp77E1nBCuR5xeiE_TzTVuZ2_zr2W7wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 11:10:02 -0500
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@...hat.com>, fw@...len.de
Cc: audit@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, eparis@...hat.com, 
	pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] audit: improve NETFILTER_PKT records

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 9:07 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 7:36 AM Ricardo Robaina <rrobaina@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, NETFILTER_PKT records lack source and destination
> > port information, which is often valuable for troubleshooting.
> > This patch series adds ports numbers, to NETFILTER_PKT records.
> >
> > The first patch refactors netfilter-related code, by moving
> > duplicated code to audit.c, by creating audit_log_nf_skb()
> > helper function.
> > The second one, improves the NETFILTER_PKT records, by
> > including source and destination ports for protocols of
> > interest.
> >
> > Ricardo Robaina (2):
> >   audit: add audit_log_nf_skb helper function
> >   audit: include source and destination ports to NETFILTER_PKT
> >
> >  include/linux/audit.h    |   8 ++
> >  kernel/audit.c           | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  net/netfilter/nft_log.c  |  58 +-------------
> >  net/netfilter/xt_AUDIT.c |  58 +-------------
> >  4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 114 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks Ricardo, both patches look good to me, I'm going to merge them
> into audit/dev-staging just to get some very basic testing, but if I
> can get an ACK from Florian on the patchset I'll go ahead and move the
> patches over to audit/dev (feeds into linux-next and the next merge
> window).

I just moved these patches in audit/dev with Florian's ACK.  Thanks everyone!

-- 
paul-moore.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ