[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251216-subheader-headstone-f374157d02b3@spud>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 18:50:04 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com,
daniel.machon@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, vkoul@...nel.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, andi.shyti@...nel.org, lee@...nel.org,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, linusw@...nel.org, olivia@...enic.com,
radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...tlin.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, romain.sioen@...rochip.com,
Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com, lars.povlsen@...rochip.com,
tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, charan.pedumuru@...rochip.com,
kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
mwalle@...nel.org, luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] dt-bindings: arm: microchip: move SparX-5 to
generic Microchip binding
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 06:01:02PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 4:58 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 15/12/2025 17:35, Robert Marko wrote:
> > > Now that we have a generic Microchip binding, lets move SparX-5 as well as
> > > there is no reason to have specific binding file for each SoC series.
> > >
> > > The check for AXI node was dropped.
> >
> > Why?
>
> According to Conor, it is pointless [1]
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20251203122313.1287950-2-robert.marko@sartura.hr/#26691879
Right, but you should say why it is being removed in the commit message.
There's probably a bunch of things you could cite for that, but mainly
it's just not something that is done for "simple-bus" devices. The
address they start at just doesn't matter for functionality and the node
itself does nothing without having children of its own (the presence of
which is enforced nowhere).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists