[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251216214229.GR3911114@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 22:42:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, void@...ifault.com,
arighi@...dia.com, changwoo@...lia.com, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: error: implicit declaration of function ‘rq_modified_clear’ (was [PATCH 5/5] sched: Rework
sched_class::wakeup_preempt() and rq_modified_*())
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 08:40:36AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Ingo, Peter, I can pull tip and resolve this from sched_ext side too but it
> would probably be cleaner to resolve from tip side?
Yeah, I'll fix it up tomorrow morning if Ingo hasn't yet. Sorry for the
mess.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists