linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/19] dt-bindings: arm: move AT91 to generic Microchip binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202512162240006f3ddfdf@mail.local>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 23:40:00 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
	claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com,
	daniel.machon@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, vkoul@...nel.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, andi.shyti@...nel.org, lee@...nel.org,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, linusw@...nel.org, olivia@...enic.com,
	radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...tlin.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
	mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
	wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, romain.sioen@...rochip.com,
	Ryan.Wanner@...rochip.com, lars.povlsen@...rochip.com,
	tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, mwalle@...nel.org,
	luka.perkov@...tura.hr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/19] dt-bindings: arm: move AT91 to generic
 Microchip binding

On 16/12/2025 20:35:49+0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> What do you think about renaming the SparX-5 binding and adding LAN969x to that?
> Cause both are from the current Microchip and from the same UNG
> business unit, with
> probably more generations to follow.
> 
> LAN969x does not really belong in Atmel bindings to me, but I am flexible.
> 

On the contrary, this is the one that is based on the "previously atmel"
BU SoCs. It is a sama7 with a microchip UNG switch while SparX-5 looks
more like a microsemi chip with ARM64 cores instead of mips.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com