lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZCZe3z8F7TsFdCz5P6mu6qzGkdoqC76XkyCCzQz+pSpmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 10:52:38 +0200
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, 
	s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, 
	daniel.baluta@....com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_dsp_rproc: only reset carveout memory at
 RPROC_OFFLINE state

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 9:59 AM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com> wrote:
>
> Don't need to reset memory at suspend and resume stage, because some
> memory is used to save the software state for resume, if it is cleared,
> the resume operation can fail.

I would rephrase this as "Do not reset memory ...".

"Don't need .." suggests that this operation is unnecessary, but not wrong.

With that,

Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ