linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't warn about complex macros in i.MX pin header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fce65a7761fb0e880beb469e2521598f@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:11:26 +0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Dwaipayan Ray
 <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan
 <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't warn about complex macros in i.MX pin
 header

On 2025-12-16 15:32, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> The pin function ID in i.MX pin headers is a tuple of <mux_reg conf_reg
> input_reg mux_mode input_val>, as below:
> "#define IMX95_PAD_DAP_TDI__JTAG_MUX_TDI  0x0000 0x0204 0x0610 0x00 
> 0x00"
> The pin headers are used by device trees, not drivers.

Nak.  Just ignore the message instead.

There would be _far_ too many exceptions to add individually to 
checkpatch.