[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DEZKDEPMCQ7N.1VK1WNX9B1ZI7@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 11:20:39 +0100
From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>
To: "Matthew Maurer" <mmaurer@...gle.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@...nel.org>, "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <lossin@...nel.org>, "Andreas
Hindborg" <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, "Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rust: Add soc_device support
On Tue Dec 16, 2025 at 1:43 AM CET, Matthew Maurer wrote:
> +/// Attributes for a SoC device.
> +///
> +/// These are both exported to userspace under /sys/devices/socX and provided to other drivers to
> +/// match against via `soc_device_match` (not yet available in Rust) to enable quirks or
> +/// device-specific support where necessary.
> +///
> +/// All fields are freeform - they have no specific formatting, just defined meanings.
> +/// For example, the [`machine`](`Attributes::machine`) field could be "DB8500" or
> +/// "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM8560 HDK", but regardless it should identify a board or product.
> +pub struct Attributes {
> + /// Should generally be a board ID or product ID. Examples
> + /// include DB8500 (ST-Ericsson) or "Qualcomm Technologies, inc. SM8560 HDK".
> + ///
> + /// If this field is not populated, the SoC infrastructure will try to populate it from
> + /// `/model` in the device tree.
> + pub machine: Option<CString>,
> + /// The broader class this SoC belongs to. Examples include ux500
> + /// (for DB8500) or Snapdragon (for SM8650).
> + ///
> + /// On chips with ARM firmware supporting SMCCC v1.2+, this may be a JEDEC JEP106 manufacturer
> + /// identification.
> + pub family: Option<CString>,
> + /// The manufacturing revision of the part. Frequently this is MAJOR.MINOR, but not always.
> + pub revision: Option<CString>,
> + /// Serial Number - uniquely identifies a specific SoC. If present, should be unique (buying a
> + /// replacement part should change it if present). This field cannot be matched on and is
> + /// solely present to export through /sys.
> + pub serial_number: Option<CString>,
> + /// SoC ID - identifies a specific SoC kind in question, sometimes more specifically than
> + /// `machine` if the same SoC is used in multiple products. Some devices use this to specify a
> + /// SoC name, e.g. "I.MX??", and others just print an ID number (e.g. Tegra and Qualcomm).
> + ///
> + /// On chips with ARM firmware supporting SMCCC v1.2+, this may be a JEDEC JEP106 manufacturer
> + /// identification (the family value) followed by a colon and then a 4-digit ID value.
> + pub soc_id: Option<CString>,
> +}
Thanks for expanding the documentation!
> +struct BuiltAttributes {
> + // While `inner` has pointers to `_backing`, it is to the interior of the `CStrings`, not
> + // `backing` itself, so it does not need to be pinned.
> + _backing: Attributes,
> + // `Opaque` makes us `!Unpin`, as the registration holds a pointer to `inner` when used.
> + inner: Opaque<bindings::soc_device_attribute>,
> +}
> +
> +fn cstring_to_c(mcs: &Option<CString>) -> *const kernel::ffi::c_char {
> + mcs.as_ref()
> + .map(|cs| cs.as_char_ptr())
> + .unwrap_or(core::ptr::null())
> +}
> +
> +impl BuiltAttributes {
> + fn as_mut_ptr(&self) -> *mut bindings::soc_device_attribute {
> + self.inner.get()
> + }
> +}
> +
> +impl Attributes {
> + fn build(self) -> BuiltAttributes {
> + BuiltAttributes {
> + inner: Opaque::new(bindings::soc_device_attribute {
> + machine: cstring_to_c(&self.machine),
> + family: cstring_to_c(&self.family),
> + revision: cstring_to_c(&self.revision),
> + serial_number: cstring_to_c(&self.serial_number),
> + soc_id: cstring_to_c(&self.soc_id),
> + data: core::ptr::null(),
> + custom_attr_group: core::ptr::null(),
> + }),
> + _backing: self,
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/// # Safety
> +/// If a device is returned (e.g. no error), `attr` must remain valid for reads until the
> +/// returned pointer is released through `soc_device_unregister`.
> +unsafe fn register_device(attr: Pin<&BuiltAttributes>) -> Result<NonNull<bindings::soc_device>> {
> + let raw_soc =
> + // SAFETY:
> + // * The struct provided through attr is backed by pinned data next to it, so as
> + // long as attr lives, the strings pointed to by the struct will too.
> + // * `attr` is pinned, so the pinned data won't move.
> + // * If it returns a device, and so others may try to read this data, by caller
> + // invariant, `attr` won't be released until the device is.
> + error::from_err_ptr(unsafe { bindings::soc_device_register(attr.as_mut_ptr()) })?;
> + // `soc_device_register` should not return NULL, but it doesn't hurt to be paranoid.
> + NonNull::new(raw_soc).ok_or(EINVAL)
> +}
I think it turns out cleaner without this helper function, inlining the
contained code directly into Registration::new().
> +#[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]
> +/// Registration handle for your soc_dev. If you let it go out of scope, your soc_dev will be
> +/// unregistered.
> +pub struct Registration {
> + #[pin]
> + attr: BuiltAttributes,
> + soc_dev: NonNull<bindings::soc_device>,
> +}
> +
> +// SAFETY: We provide no operations through `&Registration`.
> +unsafe impl Sync for Registration {}
> +
> +// SAFETY: All pointers are normal allocations, not thread-specific.
> +unsafe impl Send for Registration {}
> +
> +#[pinned_drop]
> +impl PinnedDrop for Registration {
> + fn drop(self: Pin<&mut Self>) {
> + // SAFETY: Device always contains a live pointer to a soc_device that can be unregistered
> + unsafe { bindings::soc_device_unregister(self.soc_dev.as_ptr()) }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +impl Registration {
> + /// Register a new SoC device
> + pub fn register(attr: Attributes) -> impl PinInit<Self, Error> {
Let's just call this Registration::new() please. We usually use new() if we
return a Registration object (or an initializer as in this case) and register()
if we do not return a Registration object, but rather automatically clean up the
registration silently, e.g. through devres.
> + try_pin_init!(&this in Self {
You should be able to just access Self::attr directly, i.e. no need for &this.
(When you access attr within the code block of soc_dev it will be Self::attr and
not the attr from the function argument.)
Please find a diff [1] below.
> + attr: attr.build(),
> + // SAFETY: We have already initialized attr, and we are inside PinInit and Self
> + // is !Unpin, so attr won't be moved and is valid. If it returns success, attr
> + // will not be dropped until after our `PinnedDrop` implementation runs, so the
> + // device will be unregistered first.
> + soc_dev: unsafe {
> + register_device(Pin::new_unchecked(&(*this.as_ptr()).attr))?
> + },
> + }? Error)
> + }
> +}
[1]
diff --git a/rust/kernel/soc.rs b/rust/kernel/soc.rs
index fb9e46121878..242dcd09e7f5 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/soc.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/soc.rs
@@ -89,22 +89,6 @@ fn build(self) -> BuiltAttributes {
}
}
-/// # Safety
-/// If a device is returned (e.g. no error), `attr` must remain valid for reads until the
-/// returned pointer is released through `soc_device_unregister`.
-unsafe fn register_device(attr: Pin<&BuiltAttributes>) -> Result<NonNull<bindings::soc_device>> {
- let raw_soc =
- // SAFETY:
- // * The struct provided through attr is backed by pinned data next to it, so as
- // long as attr lives, the strings pointed to by the struct will too.
- // * `attr` is pinned, so the pinned data won't move.
- // * If it returns a device, and so others may try to read this data, by caller
- // invariant, `attr` won't be released until the device is.
- error::from_err_ptr(unsafe { bindings::soc_device_register(attr.as_mut_ptr()) })?;
- // `soc_device_register` should not return NULL, but it doesn't hurt to be paranoid.
- NonNull::new(raw_soc).ok_or(EINVAL)
-}
-
#[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]
/// Registration handle for your soc_dev. If you let it go out of scope, your soc_dev will be
/// unregistered.
@@ -131,14 +115,24 @@ fn drop(self: Pin<&mut Self>) {
impl Registration {
/// Register a new SoC device
pub fn register(attr: Attributes) -> impl PinInit<Self, Error> {
- try_pin_init!(&this in Self {
+ try_pin_init!(Self {
attr: attr.build(),
// SAFETY: We have already initialized attr, and we are inside PinInit and Self
// is !Unpin, so attr won't be moved and is valid. If it returns success, attr
// will not be dropped until after our `PinnedDrop` implementation runs, so the
// device will be unregistered first.
- soc_dev: unsafe {
- register_device(Pin::new_unchecked(&(*this.as_ptr()).attr))?
+ soc_dev: {
+ // SAFETY:
+ // * The struct provided through attr is backed by pinned data next to it,
+ // so as long as attr lives, the strings pointed to by the struct will too.
+ // * `attr` is pinned, so the pinned data won't move.
+ // * If it returns a device, and so others may try to read this data, by
+ // caller invariant, `attr` won't be released until the device is.
+ let raw_soc = error::from_err_ptr(unsafe {
+ bindings::soc_device_register(attr.as_mut_ptr())
+ })?;
+
+ NonNull::new(raw_soc).ok_or(EINVAL)?
},
}? Error)
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists