[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aUE_4PUVISMm4ycL@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 11:17:52 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Skorodumov <skorodumov.dmitry@...wei.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
Julian Vetter <julian@...er-limits.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Etienne Champetier <champetier.etienne@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvlan: Make the addrs_lock be per port
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 08:00:52PM +0300, Dmitry Skorodumov wrote:
> I'm working currently on some selftests/net for ipvtap for some kind of test (test calls "ip a a/ip a d" in several threads), but I'm unsure how to proceed:
>
> This patch is supposed to be a "fix". But selftest - obviously not a fix.
>
> So, I'm unsure how to send a selftest for this.
Hi Dmitry,
I think that in cases like this - a fix coupled with a selftest for the
fixed problem - both the fix and the selftest can be included in a
patch-set targeted at net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists